Parliament sets Thursday to decide on 2024 budget

Parliament has scheduled Thursday, December 7, 2023 to take a decision on the 2024 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana.

The arrangement was announced on the floor of the House last Thursday, November 30, 2023 by the leader of government business, Osei Kyei-Mensah Bonsu, who said it was “a directive from the Speaker.”

However, the various committees would scrutinise the estimates the House has received, which were four, according to the Speaker, as of that day.

Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta

To bring clarity to the status of the budget, the Speaker, Alban Sumana Kingsford Bagbin, said it was still before Parliament.

This follows his ruling on Thursday, November 30, 2023 where he emphasised that the “Budget is still before the House,” a ruling that put to rest arguments and counter-arguments over its approval or otherwise.

The House was thrown into a state of confusion on Wednesday, November 29, 2023 when the Speaker, after an intense debate on the subject matter, put the question on the voice vote for the approval or otherwise of the 2024 Budget.

After an intense audible voice vote on the matter, the Speaker proffered an opinion to that effect.

“Hon. Members, I think the “Ayes” have it,” he pronounced.

The standing orders allow the Speaker to state an opinion if he is not sure of the voice note, and when that is not challenged, he then goes ahead to make the ruling without saying what he thinks.

Speaker’s ruling challenged

The Deputy Minority Leader and NDC MP for Ellembelle, Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah, coming under Order 113 (2) of the Standing Orders of the House, challenged the Speaker’s ruling and, in the process, called for a head count.

Order 113(2) of the Standing Orders of Parliament states that, “A Member may call for headcount or division if the opinion of Mr. Speaker on the voice vote is challenged.”

Parliament of Ghana

However, the deputy Majority Leader and NPP MP for Effutu, Alexander Afenyo Markin, raised a procedural objection to Buah’s application, noting that such an application should have come under a substantive motion, but his intervention was ignored.

Order 93 (5) of the Standing Orders of Parliament states that, “the conduct of Mr. Speaker, Members, the Chief Justice and Judges of the Superior Court of Judicature shall not be raised, except upon a substantive motion, and in any amendment, question to a Member or remarks in a debate on a motion dealing with any other subject, any reference to the conduct of the persons mentioned shall be out of order.”

As the House was waiting for the next directive from the Speaker, he called for a division, instead of the headcount requested by Buah.

Majority Caucus walks out

This infuriated the Majority Caucus, which staged a walkout in protest against the Speaker’s call for a division.

Afenyo Markin later explained to journalists at a press conference that, “the decision to call for a division was certainly not the initial application. Leadership of the Majority—well aware that under our rules, being absent during a headcount disqualifies a member from being recorded present, whereas in a division, absent members who rush in can be counted as participants, even if they were not present when the question was initially put—moved to halt this process that would have allowed some of the Minority MPs who were outside Accra at the time to be able to proceed to Parliament to be counted, even though the Majority was fully aware that it was not going to give the Minority any advantage”.

He added, “This departure from the call for a headcount generated headcount and was set to frustrate government business, at the same time undermining the sanctity of parliamentary processes. Since 1993, Parliament has never resorted to division in making decisions.

The majority concluded the choice for a division was unfair under the circumstances, leading to their decision to stage a walkout. It is essential to note that despite the Speaker’s indication that the “Ayes’ had prevailed and despite a petition presented to him, a petition that hadn’t followed due process, the Speaker’s initial ruling on “Ayes” retaining their advantage stands.

Consequently, the budget has been duly passed until the appeal for a headcount is dealt with, not the division that the Speaker had called”.

Adjournment

Following the walkout by the Majority side, the Speaker then adjourned sitting to the following day, Thursday, November 30, 2023.

A determination of Buah’s request was, therefore, not attended to, thereby, making the 2024 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government hang in a balance.

On resumption of sitting on Thursday, November 30, 2023 both sides of the House put in a spirited argument and counter-argument over the subject matter.

The Minority Leader, Cassiel Ato Forson, noted that the 2024 budget was not approved and cautioned the Finance Minister from further making a pronouncement to that effect.

“Mr. Speaker, you upheld the challenge and called for headcount. The information out there, led by the Minister responsible for Finance, is that the budget has been approved.

“Mr. Speaker, this matter is grave and there is a need for us to set the records straight. This is particularly important because a budget statement is an important document for the state. Ghanaians have the impression that the budget statement has been approved, while we here know that the budget has not been approved.

As we speak, the budget has not been approved by the Parliament of Ghana and it is important for the people of Ghana to be made aware of this. I called on the Majority Leader to correct the records and to urge the Minister responsible for Finance to desist from the comments.

“Mr. Speaker, I also urge you to set the records straight because there is a lot of confusion out there that the budget has been approved while we here know that the budget is hanging”, he noted.

The Majority Leader, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, on the other hand, insisted that the 2024 budget be approved.

“Mr. Speaker, your own votes and proceedings indicate to you that the question was put in the opinion of the Speaker who was in the chair, and the motion was agreed to. Mr. Speaker, subsequent to that, we are told that the headcount was sought by the deputy Minority Leader”. That request is the one that is being handled, not the decision, he stressed.

But the Speaker, in a response, ruled that “the Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government for the year 2024 are still before the House and not hanging,” noting further that the Business Committee would reschedule it for a determination next week.

By: Stephen Odoi-Larbi

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here