President Mahama announced that government is reviewing the unfinished Agenda 111 hospital projects and is considering a partnership with faith-based organisations (FBOs) that already run hospitals. An AESL-led assessment of all outstanding sites is under way and the government will complete facilities that are uncompleted, while inviting FBOs to take over and complete others that match their outreach and congregation locations. The President said full details will be shared after the review.
The President’s proposal to partner with faith-based organisations to complete selected Agenda 111 hospitals is a pragmatic and strategically sound move that deserves public backing. Agenda 111 was conceived with noble ambition to expand healthcare access across the country, but the reality on the ground is uneven progress.
Some hospitals are near completion while others remain little more than foundations. At a time of constrained public resources, refusing to reconsider how unfinished projects are brought to life would be irresponsible. The President’s plan recognises that ensuring functional hospitals reach communities sooner is more important than clinging to a single, costly mode of delivery.
Faith-based organisations are not outsiders to our health system, they are long-standing partners. Mission hospitals and religious health networks have for decades delivered reliable, compassionate care, especially in rural and underserved areas. They have operational experience, trained staff, community trust and often the discipline and local networks needed to make health facilities work.
Inviting FBOs to adopt and complete suitable Agenda 111 sites is, therefore, not an abdication of state responsibility but a clever use of existing national capacity. It transforms half-built promises into functioning hospitals more quickly than might be possible through stretched government budgets and overburdened project teams.
Crucially, the President’s emphasis on a thorough assessment before any handovers is the right approach. AESL’s mapping of every outstanding site will provide the data required for sound decisions, which facilities are near completion and should be finished by the state, and which are better matched to the reach and mission of faith-based managers.
This transparency and methodical matching reduce the risk of arbitrary transfers and ensure that each facility serves the public interest. Allowing FBOs to choose hospitals that align with their congregational footprint also increases the likelihood of successful long-term management and better integration into community health networks.
There are legitimate concerns to address chiefly around equity, affordability, and continuity of public health obligations. But these are solvable through clear, binding agreements that preserve the public character of essential services.
Any partnership must guarantee adherence to national clinical standards, integration with the national health insurance scheme, pricing safeguards for the poor, and oversight mechanisms that ensure accountability. If properly structured, a handover can retain a hospital’s public-access mandate while benefiting from the operational strengths of mission-run systems.
President Mahama’s simultaneous warning against corruption must not be taken lightly. Large infrastructure programmes have historically been vulnerable to mismanagement and the public’s mistrust will not be cured by rhetoric alone. The administration must make the assessment process and any resulting agreements publicly auditable. Demonstrable anti-corruption measures clear procurement audits, open disclosure of project statuses and independent oversight are essential to ensure the policy is implemented for the public good rather than private gain.
Ultimately, the point of Agenda 111 was never to score political points, it was to put hospitals where Ghanaians need them. If partnering with faith-based organisations delivers functioning, well-managed hospitals to communities faster and more efficiently, then it is a policy worth supporting.
The President’s reassessment shows a willingness to adapt strategy to reality, and that humility is the hallmark of responsible governance. What now matters is rigorous implementation: transparent assessments, binding safeguards for access and affordability and uncompromising oversight.
Done right, this partnership can turn stalled construction sites into lifesaving institutions and finally deliver on the promise of expanded healthcare for all.
For more news, join The Chronicle Newspaper channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBSs55E50UqNPvSOm2z
